Table of Contents

The Case for Net Promoter Score as a Measure of Presentation Effectiveness

When it comes to post-training evaluation forms, the rule of thumb to which I’ve adhered is: high scores may not guarantee learning happened, but low scores often guarantee learning didn’t happen.

For years I’ve tabulated and delivered feedback for countless sessions that have received Likert-scale scores well above 4 (on a 5-point scale), yet I knew deep down that some of these presentations weren’t as effective as they could be. How can we tell if the presentation was engaging and effective if the post-training evaluation scores are always high?

Several weeks ago I attended a Training Magazine-sponsored webinar on training metrics (view the recording here) and I was introduced to the idea of Net Promoter Score as a way to evaluate presentations. After some deliberation, my colleagues and I decided to test this concept out during a recent 2-day meeting. We added one question to our evaluation forms: Would you recommend this session to a colleague?

Following are the scores from our traditional question about whether people were exposed to new insights, information or ideas on a scale of 1-5 (5 representing “Strongly Agree”):

NPS 1

Not too shabby. Apparently we were exposing people to new insights, information and ideas! So that’s good, right? Who cares whether presenters were engaging or boring, stuck to their lesson plans or went off script, all the scores averaged between 4 and 5. Yay for us!

Then we took a look at the same sessions through the lens of Net Promoter Score, and this is what we found:

NPS 2

These scores showed some variance, but it didn’t tell much of a story until we put these scores side-by-side:

NPS 3

People may have been exposed to some new ideas or insights in each session, but would they put their own reputation on the line and recommend the session to any of their colleagues? It depends. There’s a huge difference between presentations that scored above 4.5 and presentations that drew an average of 4.2.

Here are three reasons why I think this matters:

1. A Wake-up Call. In the past, someone could walk away from a meeting with a score of 4.13 and think to himself: “Well, I wasn’t as sharp as I could have been, but people still liked that session, so I don’t really need to work to improve my delivery… and furthermore, who cares about all these adult learning principles that people keep telling me I need to include?!”

However, if that same presenter sees a Net Promoter Score of 6 or 19 or 31 (with a high score potential of 100), the reaction is very different. People suddenly seem a little more interested in tightening up their next presentation – rehearsing a little more seriously, having instructions for activities down cold, sticking more closely to their lesson plans.

2. Before On-the-Job Application, People Need To Remember Your Content. Some L&D practitioners care less about whether a presentation was engaging, instead being wholly focused on whether or not someone actually does something new or differently or better on the job. To this, I say: “Yes, and…”

Yes, better performance is the ultimate goal for most training programs.

And, you can’t do something new or differently or better if you weren’t paying attention to the presentation. You can’t do something better if you forgot what you learned before you go to bed that evening. While better job performance matters, the presenter plays a big role in whether or not people remember the content and are excited to use it when they return to their offices.

3. Marketing Matters. The principle objection to Net Promoter Score as a training evaluation tool, articulated very well in this post from Dr. Will Thalheimer, is that it is designed for marketing, not for training effectiveness. I would argue that L&D professionals must have some sort of marketing chops in order to generate interest in their programs. After all, Dr. Thalheimer also cited a significant body of research that “found that one misdirected comment by a team leader can wipe out the full effects of a training program.”  If influential people wouldn’t recommend your presentation, research shows that you have a problem.

What do you think? Is Net Promoter Score something you’ve used (or are thinking about using)? Or is it a misguided metric, not suitable for L&D efforts?

 

 

 

Instructor-Led Training Resources

These are some of our favorite resources to support everyone involved with instructor-led training.

Training Delivery and Facilitation Competency Rubric

A rubric is a way to assess performance with a standard set of evaluation criteria. The next time you need to assess the performance of someone delivering training (even if that someone is you), you may find this rubric helpful.

The Role of Co-facilitators

Co-facilitators play an important role in a training workshop. The most obvious benefit is that when you co-facilitate, you get a break from leading the

18 Instructor-led Training Activities

Engaging, intentional, face-to-face and virtual instructor-led training activities can make the difference between a session that helps learners to apply new skills or knowledge and one that falls flat.

Articles Similar to The Case for Net Promoter Score as a Measure of Presentation Effectiveness

facilitator competency rubric
ILT & VILT
Brian Washburn

Training Delivery and Facilitation Competency Rubric

A rubric is a way to assess performance with a standard set of evaluation criteria. The next time you need to assess the performance of someone delivering training (even if that someone is you), you may find this rubric helpful.

instructor becomes the pupil with kassy laborie and zovig garboushian
ILT & VILT
Brian Washburn

Turning the Tables: From Trainer to Student

As people who have designed and delivered effective training, Kassy Laborie and Zovig Garboushian know a thing or two about good learning experiences. So what nuggets have they gleaned from a 9-month course that they’re both attending, and that all of us should consider when designing our own programs? Today’s podcast answers that question.

John Crook on role play
ILT & VILT
Brian Washburn

Is this the world’s most effective role play?

When it comes to your training participants, two of the dirtiest, or perhaps scariest, words you can say during a session may be: role play. In today’s podcast, John Crook, Head of Learning at Intersol Global, offers some thoughts on how to make role plays more authentic and robust.

Subscribe to Get Updates from Endurance Learning

Brian Washburn, Author

Brian Washburn
CEO & Chief Ideas Guy

Enter your information below and we’ll send you the latest updates from our blog. Thanks for following!

Grow your L&D Career Today!

The Foundations of L&D course through the L&D Pro Academy provides the concepts and practical experience you need to grow your confidence and abilities as a well-rounded L&D professional.

Enter your email below and we’ll be in touch with an info sheet!

L&D Pro Academy

Find Your L&D Career Path

Explore the range of careers to understand what role might be a good fit for your L&D career.

Enter your email below and we’ll send you the PDF of the What’s Possible in L&D Worksheet.

What's possible in L&D

Let's Talk Training!

Brian Washburn

Brian Washburn
CEO & Chief Ideas Guy

Enter your information below and we’ll get back to you soon.

Download the Feedback Lesson Plan

Enter your email below and we’ll send you the lesson plan as a PDF.

feedback lesson plan
MS Word Job Aid Template

Download the Microsoft Word Job Aid Template

Enter your email below and we’ll send you the Word version of this template.

Download the Free Lesson Plan Template!

Enter your email below and we’ll send you a Word document that you can start using today!

free lesson plan template
training materials checklist

Download the Training Materials Checklist

Enter your email below and we’ll send you the PDF of the Training Materials Checklist.

Subscribe to Endurance Learning for updates

Get regular updates from the Endurance Learning team.